Size 62-92 cm
Post your pictures and notes about this pattern here!
Printable View
Size 62-92 cm
Post your pictures and notes about this pattern here!
To me it seems like the top runs really big, and the neck opening was much too big, but it is possible I did not overlap it enough.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2428/...f37202e365.jpghttp://farm4.static.flickr.com/3247/...c84e70896f.jpg
in 80cm, i think its a great fit for ds but i think in future for me, lapped tee (at least the ribbing) should be sewn with c/l. mine was with rib knit and after the while, the neckline was saggy.
http://photos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-...57248_3817.jpg
the girl version
http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-...018_351208.jpg
I really like both the boy and girl versions of this. Agree about c/l for the neckline. The design mean it fits forever too!
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_u0yVHJtqnPw/Sp...skyw-curls.jpg
http://lh3.ggpht.com/_u0yVHJtqnPw/Sq...ksis-tunic.jpg
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_u0yVHJtqnPw/Sp...s400/baby9.jpg
For DS2 later this fall. These are about a sz 62. The red CA interlock wasn't stretchy enough so I had to enlarge those pieces. This was the first time for me to try the "Otto" binding. (On the neckline.) I added a band to the shirt tail instead of doing the binding as directed. Thanks for looking!
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/n.../081910044.jpg
This is my first attempt sewing with thermal. The bindings are a bit wonky.
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/n.../083010032.jpg
this pattern is really fun and easy to whip up! i can see where others thought the neck was a bit on the wide side. i might tighten it up a bit on the next one. made with the hupsis pants from the same issue.
http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o...sgood/owls.jpg
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...g/DSCF2714.jpg
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...g/DSCF2707.jpg
These are both from Otto 1-09. Muksis and hupsis. Both size 80 in width. The shirt is 86 in length, the pants are 92 in length with a bit of the rise cut off.
The smallest size!! With an applique on the front. On these I did overlap the front a little more than called for, but they still look large in the pics....
http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/h...977/017-12.jpg